<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Real-Time Economy Community - New ideas</title>
<link>http://realtimeeconomy.net/blogs_feed/new/1/en/9/cash%2520payment%2520fee</link>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:54:29 GMT</pubDate>
<item>
<title>Innovative RFID-applications</title>
<link>http://realtimeeconomy.net/blogs/show/1/5/34/Innovative_RFID-applications_-_Mikael_Fagerholm</link>
<author>Mikael Fagerholm</author>
<category>rfid</category>
<category>cash payment fee</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://realtimeeconomy.net/blogs/show/1/5/34/Innovative_RFID-applications_-_Mikael_Fagerholm</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 13:19:45 GMT</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;An example of a person wanting to use a public toilet but not having any coins available. The process of going to ATM which has a line, changing the bill to coins and then finally&amp;nbsp; changing the coin to a polet which gives access to toilet takes a significant amount of time.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Our suggestion is that this toilet access could be transferred to a similar RFID-platform as the travel card. So every day services could be carried in your pocket in a pre-paid form with an ease of use.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This of course would require the installation of readers in lots of places and defining which services should be transformed. These are just a few limitations which come to mind. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sonera promotes e-invoicing</title>
<link>http://realtimeeconomy.net/blogs/show/1/9/27/Sonera_promotes_e-invoicing_-_Esko_Penttinen</link>
<author>Esko Penttinen</author>
<category>e-invoicing</category>
<category>cash payment fee</category>
<category>e-payment discount</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://realtimeeconomy.net/blogs/show/1/9/27/Sonera_promotes_e-invoicing_-_Esko_Penttinen</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 08:51:24 GMT</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Sonera encourages its consumer customers to move to electronic invoicing by placing a 1 euro fee on paper invoices. We need more companies like Sonera to make this kind of a statement!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kauppalehti.fi/5/i/talous/uutiset/etusivu/uutinen.jsp?oid=10151&quot; title=&quot;http://www.kauppalehti.fi/5/i/talous/uutiset/etusivu/uutinen.jsp?oid=10151&quot;&gt;http://www.kauppalehti.fi/5/i/talous/uutiset/etusivu/uutinen.jsp?oid=10151&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Clash of interests</title>
<link>http://realtimeeconomy.net/blogs/show/1/3/14/Clash_of_interests_-_Krzysztof_Dorota</link>
<author>Krzysztof Dorota</author>
<category>cash payment fee</category>
<category>e-payment discount</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://realtimeeconomy.net/blogs/show/1/3/14/Clash_of_interests_-_Krzysztof_Dorota</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:43:05 GMT</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Despite of the real-time world,&amp;nbsp; Mr. Same Guy as a buyer will&amp;nbsp; keep all his payments on hold until the respective due date, paying A.L (ate).A.P. That&#39;s the standard way of doing payments.&amp;nbsp; This clash of interests between the payees and payers might potentially create some tension in the RTE. However,&amp;nbsp;it can be solved by rewarding payers committing payments&amp;nbsp;before the due day. The earlier and cheaper way&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;(for the payee) you pay the less you pay. It simply couldn&#39;t be simpler.&amp;nbsp; Because of the considerable handling cost (50 Bn Euro / yearly in Europe),&amp;nbsp;cash payments shall be penalized instead of being favored. But that&#39;s another story.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

